Wednesday 26 December 2012

Murderous Cop gets charged..As it should be..

One at a time. Until they all get the message that we will not tolerate their John Wayne Syndrome towards our Pets. Despite they feel they are entitled to pull their gun and murder without consequences. This is just a small first step. Lets let it become large and nation wide. 


COMMERCE CITY, Colo. – Chloe, a lab and pit bull mix, was shot and killed by officers on Nov. 23, and the entire incident was caught on camera.
Police said the video showed them killing the dog after it tried to attack. Adams County District Attorney Don Quick felt differently, charging one of the officers with animal cruelty on Thursday.
Officer Robert Price will be officially charged with aggravated cruelty to animals, a Class 6 felony. This was after Quick’s office investigated the shooting.
According to Quick, that investigation included a canvass of the neighborhood, interviews with 15 witnesses and a viewing of the eyewitness video.
That graphic video (a censored version of which can be seen above) shows the entire ordeal on cell phone video. Two officers Tase the dog first. The animal then attempts to flee, at which point an Animal Control official appears to snag it with a catch pole.
Despite appearing to have nowhere to run, an officer can be seen shooting and killing the dog.
Kenny Collins shot the video. He lives across the street from where the incident occurred in the neighborhood near 96th and Nucla.
Collins was also the one who called 911 to report a large loose dog wandering around the neighborhood. He said he didn’t know the dog belonged to a family across the street from his house.
The Commerce City Police Department ruled that the shooting was justified a few days after the incident.
READ THE REST: http://kdvr.com/2012/12/20/commerce-city-officer-charged-with-animal-cruelty-in-dog-killing/

Monday 24 December 2012

It is the law. Not only that your pet must have food and appropiate
vet. care. BUT IT MUST HAVE SHELTER. please bring in your pet or provide it with a dog house with dry hay/blanket inside. 

Tuesday 9 October 2012

More murder of pets by cops.

Duke is a 3 1/2 yr old American Bulldog mix unfairly being labeled as "dangerous." Description In a head-shaking legal mess in Ohio, a single mom (Carissa Curry) is facing charges after her "pit-like" dog (Duke) bit a would-be intruder while she was at work. The ‘victim’ claims that the dog was outside her fenced yard and attacked him; Duke is not an outside dog, however, and does not stay in the yard unless he is with family. In the courts, roles have been essentially reversed: The Lucas County Dog Warden is pressing charges against Carissa, treating her as the criminal. This calls to mind the Pennsylvania burglar who sued homeowners after he got stuck in their garage. Every viewer who saw that story was left shaking his head over justice gone wrong. To complicate matters, Carissa has no funds for legal defense. As a single mom, she has pulled herself up by her bootstraps to better herself and her 2-year-old son. She recently saved enough to move out of her parents' home and into a rental home. At the urging of fans, Carissa set up a website for donations; to this point, it has garnered more than $650. Given the potential publicity, however, it would be worth an attorney's time to champion her cause for reduced fees. Another interesting aspect is that Carissa is a huge animal advocate. In addition to raising Duke and a litter of kittens, she recently nursed a dehydrated young fox back to life. It is now awaiting release at a wildlife rehabilitation center. The consequences of a "dangerous dog" label are severe: If convicted, Duke will carry the label forever. Carissa will have to pay $100 a year to license him. She will have to completely enclose her yard, as if caging a bear. Duke will have to be muzzled anytime he leaves his yard. And Carissa fears eviction and could lose her job in home health care. Please join Carissa's supporters to get Duke cleared of any unjust laeling from this ridiculous incident. For more information, click this link to the article in DogHeirs: http://www.dogheirs.com/dogheirs/posts/1982-single-mom-asks-public-for-support-after-dog-bites-alleged-home-intruder Direct link to the petition: https://www.change.org/petitions/lucas-county-dog-warden-remove-the-dangerous-designation-from-duke-drop-the-charge-against-carissa-2?utm_campaign=friend_inviter_modal&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=share_petition&utm_term=26385919

Friday 5 October 2012

Friday 21 September 2012

COPS KILL ANOTHER DOG


ELDORADO -- An Eldorado man is demanding justice after he says a police officer shot and killed his dog.

The Eldorado Police Department won't comment on the incident because it is under investigation. The dog's owner, Jason Robershaw, says the shooting was a gross error of judgement by an officer, and he wants to make sure his dog's death doesn't get swept under the rug.

"He was my best friend, so I just don't want this to go away quietly," said Robershaw.

Robershaw's six-year-old German Shepherd, Smokey, was more than a dog, he was a member of the family.

"I just sat here and watched my dog die," said Robershaw.

Robershaw said he and his fiancée were eating dinner last Sunday evening, when they heard a knock at the back door. A few moments later they heard a bark, a gunshot, then silence.

"Immediately when I opened the door I saw my dog lying there about 18-inches from the end of his chain. He was just shaking, and his tongue was hanging out and blood was coming out," said Robershaw.

Robershaw said an Eldorado officer told him he feared for his life. He claimed the dog came at him and attacked him when he knocked on the door. Robershaw says his dog was not dangerous, and he believes the officer made a poor decision out of panic.

"The officer had no right to come on my private property and shoot my dog, which was on a leash. The dog was doing what it's supposed to do. It is the protector of this house," said Robershaw.

To make matters worse, Robershaw said it all could have been avoided.

"He was at the wrong house, he was here to investigate a stolen ladder," said Robershaw. Robershaw says that the house the officer wanted was actually one block away.

"I can't say exactly what happened in the two to three seconds that it took for me to get to the door, but all I know is within that two to three seconds my dog was laying on the ground. It's something I'm going to remember for the rest of my life," said Robershaw.

News 3 filed a freedom of information request for a copy of the police report. Police Chief Shannon Deuel says it should be ready for release on Monday. The officer at the center of the investigation remains on active duty. Chief Deuel says the officer has worked at the department just short of one year.


http://www.wsiltv.com/news/local/Eldorado-Man-Accuses-Police-of-Killing-Dog-170392616.html

Sunday 16 September 2012

Sex abusers...Animal abusers..all despicable.


Animal abusers in N.Y. may have to register like sex offenders

New York City could become the largest jurisdiction to establish a registry for animal abusers, similar to the ones for sex offenders, if it approves a law prompted by a man who threw his dog out of a third-story window.
The measure introduced in the City Council this week would require convicted animal abusers to provide their names, home addresses and photographs for an online registry, available to animal shelters and pet shops. The abusers would be barred from owning animals. 
“We want to keep defenseless animals out of the hands of known abusers,” said the measure’s chief sponsor, Councilman Peter F. Vallone Jr.  The bill comes after a 30-year-old Queens, N.Y., man killed his pet Shar-Pei last year by throwing it out of his third-floor window.  The man was sentenced to 364 days in jail and barred from owning an animal for three years.
Three New York counties--Suffolk, Albany and Rockland--have established animal abuse registries. Registry bills have been introduced in nine states this year, according to the Animal Legal Defense Fund.








http://itsfortheanimals.blogspot.com/?zx=488117a4a86b669d

Thursday 6 September 2012


MURDERED. And it happens too often. We must strike back and bring to justice these killers.
On may 25th my day began as usual with Sobe's eyes across my pillow whining to go outside, and Spade's feet pressing against my back, it was our morning ritual. I let them out and noticed that Sobe who was solid white was lookin a little dingy so I decided I would put them in their cage to play while I cleaned my house and than bathe them before having them come in for the rest of the day. I walked the dogs to the backyard where their cage was, cleaned their water buckets and gave them fresh food and water, and than filled their swimming pool up so it would get semi warm for there bathes. I returned inside my home to clean and tidy the house...I was inside maybe an hour not knowing that my dogs were no longer in their cage but in the neighbors backyard.
    The dogs had pushed a small corner of their cage back and how they fit their selves through will remain a mystery to me but they did. While finishing the dishes I heard four of the most gutwrenching sounds of my life. I heard a set of two shotgun blasts, a brief pause and then a second set. Boom Boom...Boom Boom! and in that moment my heart literlly fell to the floor. I raced to my back door and screamed their names hoping to see their heads pop out of their dog house but no, I wouldnt see their faces however just beyond the sight of their cage I saw the Animal Control vehicle 200 yards from where I stood and it was then that I knew they shot them.I flew to my neighbors home where the news was delivered that "Yes Mam I was forced to shoot your dogs"
    All I asked was to have their bodies. It took me an hours worth of arguing as well as200 dollars to have them brought to my home. I was met by officers with arrogant attitudes, as if saying to me, you should be thanking me. I stopped your dogs before they killed someone or something. 
     Even still arguing with me as to where to lay their bodies, I wanted them laid on my front porch, which meant the officer would have to walk them across my yard getting his uniform bloody. He had managed to shoot them without so much as a single spec of blood getting on him and he wasnt about to get blood on his hands at the end of it. After standing there for ten minutes trying to convince me because I have a small child it would be in my best interest to allow them to dispose of the dogs because it would be distressing to her, I told the officers I believe there is no way around distressing my child.
    As I watched the man first bring Spade to me then Sobe laying them side by side I noticed, these animals are shot in their sides not their face, not their chest! I asked the officer again,"So you shot these dogs in the side for violently charging you officer?" He replied, "Yes Mam I had no other choice." I told the officers, "These were good dogs and had never bit anyone or anything, this officer was excessive for dogs that did not bite anyone or anything." His supervisor looked me dead in the eyes and said and I quote, "These dogs were shot primarily for the potential harm they posed my officer." 
    My tickets were then handed to me tickets, they had my dogs blood on them. I watched the officers return to their vehicles, no I'm sorry, and no remorse. Just an arrogant attitude and a fine. That was my payment for paying this city the liscence to have a dog and keeping my animals up to date on shots and having an enclosure, collars and tags around their necks, but I guess that only applies to people who dont have pitbulls.

If you can help. She wants these people to pay for murdering her precious animals. And just ONCE if someone does pay it might save someone else's pets. Things are getting so out of hand.

Sunday 2 September 2012

Cops Murder Pet in its' own house. 


On August 15, 2012 Wayne County Sheriff's deputies, along with Macedon, NY Police broke into 75 year old Phyllis Loquasto's Plank Road home in the town of Walworth, NY, forced her at gunpoint to lay on her bathroom floor, screamed at her to close her eyes and stay down, then executed her dog "Duke."

Minutes earlier, Loquasto, who has had three strokes and a knee replacement, was on her computer when she heard loud smashing sounds, then saw what she described as several men dressed in black with masks on.

As she was laying on her bathroom floor Loquasto could hear the men talking in loud voices.

"The dog hadn't even barked, yet I heard one of them say, he's aggressive, shoot him! I'll never forget the sound of that gunshot and the blood flying everywhere. They did all this while forcing me to lay on the bathroom floor, screaming at me to stay down, and holding me at gunpoint. I couldn't get up if I wanted to. I'm 75 years old, had three strokes and knee replacement, and can hardly walk. There was nothing I could do to help my pet."

Unfortunately, Duke died a slow death.
"They shot him with a shotgun in such a manner that he ran around in pain and bled all over the house and suffered a slow, cruel death. There was no reason for this kind of treatment, they killed my dog for no reason. This was the sweetest and most gentle animal anyone could want, I would trust him with a baby."
As you can see in the photo, Duke did indeed suffer, bleeding out throughout the house, leaving a trail of blood in the hallways, stairs, walls and bedrooms, including on the bed where he used to sleep in.

 Afterwards, Phyllis Loquasto was taken outside and placed inside a police car for over an hour in the heat.
It was then when officers showed her a search warrant, and it was then that Loquasto realized who these masked men who had just broke into her home, held her at gunpoint, screamed at her and executed her dog were -- police officers.

The 75 year old Loquasto was so afraid, she urinated on herself.

As a filmmaker, writer and activist exposing police misconduct and corruption, hearing stories of police officers abusing and violating innocent citizens' rights is nothing new.

In fact I receive an average of 20-25 calls weekly from people who either themselves, or a loved one, has been abused, harassed, or assaulted by law enforcement.

But I must admit, to hear of a 75 year old lady having been terrorized in her own home by a bunch of rogue, thugs in uniforms and masks, in a "home invasion-like" style, before executing her dog, left me speechless.

I Called Macedon, NY police and asked to speak to a public information officer. The woman who answered the phone asked me "What's that?" I explained to her it's usually a department official who is in charge of communicating with the press.

She replied "We don't have that."
I then proceeded to tell her about the incident with Duke, and before I could finish, she angrily cut me off and said "I'm sure if a grandmother would have been held down at gunpoint, I would have heard about that."

 She then abruptly transferred me to the Chief, with whom I left a message on his voicemail.Contact Macedon, NY Police Chief John P. Colella and let him know how you feel.

Macedon, NY Police Chief
and WayneNET Commander
John P. Colella
315-986-7103, -7262, -5932
E-mail: jpcolella@rochester.rr.com

WayneNET Sgt.
Roger LaClair
(315) 947-9711

WayneNET
Chief Deputy
Bob Hetzke
(315) 946-9711



Tuesday 28 August 2012

If someone kicked your best friend..what would you do? If you reacted would you expect to be shot in the head by a nervous trigger happy cop who didnt care as much for the dog as he did the homeless person? Who gave this little John Wayne the authority to kick people and then to shoot their dog? This is just one incident and it brings to light that cops are and have been out of hand and taking on more power than we the people have authorized them to have. 

Remember. This is supposed to be Policemen who should have the ability to distinguish between real threats and merely an act of self defense. Such as what Star displayed. If these cops felt threatened which they were not. They could have just pepper sprayed Star....but they did not. THEY DID BOTH. they shot her in the head and pepper sprayed her. Both these cops should be fired. Not fit to be a cop.
Here is the facebook page to keep up with what is now happening. A giant cover up by New York's finest. 
https://www.facebook.com/StarTheNewYorkPitbullShotByPolice/photos_stream

Saturday 25 August 2012

Thursday 2 August 2012

ROOF TOP DOGS IN MIAMI HEAT 120 degrees in daytime







G and G Fruit Market at 1201 Northwest 23rd.St.Miami,Floridafor some reason believe it is
Ok to put their two dogs on top of their roof. Its because of robbers they say...you know..robbers
on top of the roof. These two dogs seem to be well kept as they dont look skinny. But this is clear
cut animal abuse. But not so..say the cops who have been there to investigate. Not so says the
Humane Society. So I suggest that one person from each organization that declares this is fine to spend one day atop that roof with the dogs..then let me hear your opinion..disgraceful. 




Tuesday 31 July 2012

Saturday 28 July 2012

PITBULLS AND BSL UNSPEAKABLE DISGRACE FOR A CIVILIZED SOCEITY

The sins of Denver. But they are not the only ones. But they are the only ones with the best description of DOG HOLOCAUST...and leaving to people with no sense whatsoever the ability to determine breed to decide if an animal lives or dies. A picture is worth a thousand words. Though the following pics. are from earlier dates, just imagine how many bodies have piled high since these senseless killings and pics. These photos have surfaced showing some of the estimated 3,487 pit bull dogs that have been carted away from the shelter..(their dead bodies) Denver's sins..No other word will describe...except holocaust. 
.



Friday 27 July 2012

Wednesday 25 July 2012

ANIMAL FOOD BANK ONLINE

If you could spare just one dollar. This is such a worthy cause.
If you go there you can choose if you want to help feed some
animals that otherwise might not make it. 


http://petswhoneedourhelp.blogspot.com/

Monday 23 July 2012

Lennox people who cheer for his dimise. And promote BSL. WHO are they??

Wouldn't it be interesting and good to know just who are the people who defend monsters or defend an indefensible act? What are the motives of those who organize and speak so in favor of a monstrous act? I m speaking of the murder of Lennox. And this was murder pure and simple. And before that, Animal abuse. For even those glimpsing his photos show he suffered abuse. Whatever else behind the scenes only the good care takers of him know (SIC)

Anyone who defends murder bears to be noticed and watched. We have learned that from several instances lately of people who have gone off the rails and therefore committed mass murder. Only monsters defend other monsters. 


Saturday 21 July 2012

LENNOX An Army promises you. There will be justice

This next video...I call taunting..what would a poodle do? Lying corrupt killers!!

Lennox and circumstantial evidence. We already know he was a victim of animal cruelty.

Victoria Stilwell Update on Lennox. The family have told me that Belfast City Council will still not answer the family's calls and have consistently ignored their request to have Lennox's collar returned to them, nor have they returned 'Lennox's ashes.' There are many rumors circulating that Lennox died in a certain kennel location months before the BCC announced that he was euthanised and that the kennel panicked and were told by the BCC to get rid of everything Lennox related. These are still just rumors and should not be taken for hard fact until the truth is revealed. The family are 'heartbroken'. The media hype around this case might have died down but I can assure you everything will be done to ensure that one day the truth is known. Please share this with everyone you know to keep Lennox's name alive and to ensure that future dogs and their people do not have to suffer because of ignorance.

Tuesday 17 July 2012

Lennox Died Months Ago At Hands Of BCC We knew it didnt we.


This from the host of an internet Radio show. Dr. Leigh Foster. This explains the actions and the cover up. 
BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELAND—The host of an internet radio show says she has been given information by an unidentified informant that Lennox, a dog which became the center of an international effort to save his life, died months ago while in captivity in the hands of the Belfast City Council.
Dr. Leigh Foster, creator and host of The Pawz Cauze Show, says that the informant has told her that Lennox was found dead in his kennel months ago. Certainly this explains the cover up.
The BCC had rejected all efforts to save the dog after his family declined to appeal his case to the Supreme Court in London after their final appeal had been denied on June 12.
The dog had been held in captivity at a secret location since it was seized by Belfast dog wardens under the Dangerous Dog Act in May, 2010, simply because it looked like a pit bull and after they used a tape measure to determine the dog had the measurements of a “pit bull type”
The BCC issued a statement on July 11, claiming that the dog had been killed that day because it was a “dangerous dog”.
The family’s request to say goodbye to their beloved Len was heartlessly denied.
There are looming questions if Lennox was still alive as of the day before Lennox’s confirmed death as the BCC has steadfastly refused to offer any proof of his existence. They had steadfastly refused the family’s request for their own vet to examine Lennox after it was learned that the dog appeared to have been mistreated while in the care of the BCC, with sores on his neck and foot, hair falling out in clumps due to stress and depression.  He was reportedly being medicated for the stress.
The government refused the family’s request to receive his body and have said the family might receive “some” of his ashes.  They refused to return his collar to the family.
Foster’s posting read:
“ok, I have been sitting on some information given to me by an unidentified informant. I don’t know if it is true but it would explain A LOT about this case. If it is true, you all will be furious as I, but if not, then that means we can’t trust anything that comes out of Northern Ireland/UK. Here it goes:
“I was contacted shortly after I ended the show early in the morning on the 11th. The informant gave me information that I don’t know if it is the truth but I am releasing to you and hopefully we can get to the bottom of the truth. Please know that this is not from ME, I am just the messenger. This person stated that the shelter who kept Lennox hidden from the world went into his kennel one morning to give him his medication for kennel stress, food, and water. The informant stated that Lennox was found dead and the shelter panicked. They supposedly contacted BCC to see what they should do and they were told to have the body cremated immediately and to destroy the collar, clean the kennel and remove all evidence that Lennox was even there. This supposedly took place several months prior to the last court date. The informant stated that BCC told the judge and that is why the judge upheld the other rulings. According to the informant, BCC never thought that this case would cause such an uproar and by the time it did, they feared what would happen if they openly admitted that Lennox was dead already.
“IF this is in fact the truth, it would explain a lot! Why no one was able to see him, why the family could not have the body back and why the collar is missing. The saddest fact of all is that we have no proof that this is a true statement because all evidence was destroyed. The only way we will know the truth is if the informant identifies him or herself and if the shelter has a strike of conscious and speaks out. It also explains why everyone who was supposed to be able to grant amnesty were unable to thus passing the callers and public around to other people causing confusion and heightened anger.
“So there you have it. This is all I know and I have no idea who the person was. Sorry I can’t give you any more information. Know that I back you all up in this fight to know the truth. We owe it to the Barnes family and BCC owes it to the world to tell us what actually happened to Lennox.”
The dog had been held in captivity and seclusion for over two years, seized from his home in May 2010 by Belfast dog wardens in an egregious abuse of power.
Initially there was no claim that the docile family pet was aggressive but as public sentiment grew against the BCC, they began to fabricate claims that he was a dangerous dog and ultimately the court decision that led to his death said he must be put down because he had teeth and therefore was a threat to public safety because someday he might bite someone although he had never done so before and had never shown any propensity to do so.
First Minister Peter Robinson had asked the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Michelle O’Neill to review the matter “with urgency” and had asked the Lord Mayor of Belfast, Gavin Robinson, not to execute Lennox but rather to allow him to be rehomed in the United States, to accept the longstanding offer of dog expert Victoria Stilwell.
Stilwell had offered to pay all expenses associated with the relocation of the dog to a sanctuary in the U.S.  He would have been placed in the public and would have posed no risk to the public.
O’Neill never publicly addressed the issue although that is her responsibility.  The Lord Mayor of Belfast said nothing, the Queen was busy modeling track suits for the Olympics.
The BCC refused to meet with Stilwell, refused to even grant her the courtesy of a response.  The 51 councilors that comprise the BCC, while elected by the people, clearly do not represent the wishes of the people, an issue that is likely to be addressed in the next election.  7-17-12



Monday 16 July 2012

Lemmings Lies and videos..who are they? Me thinks they protest too much ....

Dear Lennox...if only we knew how much they provoked you in order to prove that you were a dangerous dog. How much they slapped you in the face....loomed over you..intimidated you..to prove their contempt. And to make sure their murder of you would be justified. Lets look at this one picture. Know that Lennox did not know these people. They were strangers to him. And if you loom over a dog that way you are challenging him in the first place. What would a human feel? Dont expect dogs to be more able to reason than a human. Notice the woman sitting so causally..does that woman look as if she is afraid of what Lennox might do.? Pictures are indeed worth a thousand words and if BCC knew their murder of Lennox would cause such an outpour of rage, they never would have taken these pictures to show their guilt. But they are so secure in knowing no one ever question them. All this time wonder how many murders they have committed.  So the bottom line is..they are liars and murderers. And it appears the people so strongly defending this murder. IE: Lemmings....are really not defending this murder at all. They are defending that BSL agenda. Connect the dots. So who could they really be?  Hmmmm  PETA????? You decide.

Lennox and the BCC cover up..continues

First they came for the Pitbull because it was such an easy target ...and I said nothing because I had a cat. And because I believed the hyp about Pitbulls. Then they came for the Rottweiler and I said nothing because I had a cat. Next was the German Shepherd and still I said nothing because I had a cat.... Then Alaskan Malautes and I said nothing because I was safe with my cat. Then...they came for all the dogs..and the list was long...and I said nothing because I had a cat. Then one day. They came for my cat.

Sunday 15 July 2012

Lennox and Pitbulls easy marks for a more sinister plot


The camel's nose under the tent were Pitbull Dogs...then breed after breed added especially
by BBC BELFAST. It is much like ethnic cleansing..Much like Hitler and his desire to
exterminate Jews. Where would it stop? People must not give that power to anyone. Much
like Serial Killers start their horrific assault begins with animals....Next people...it could happen.

Lennox Killers, BCC would have murdered this hero dog.

An eight year old pit bull has been recovering in the care of a Massachusetts animal hospital after conducting a remarkable rescue mission in May of this year. According to witnesses, the heroic dog saved the life of her owner just before she was hit by an oncoming freight train. The Massachusetts SPCA said Christine Spain of Shirley was walking home with her dog Lilly when she collapsed on the tracks. Spain’s son, Boston Police Officer David Lanteigne, says a train’s engineer watched in amazement as the dog moved her owner out of harm’s way. Traveling at a high rate of speed, the train was unable to come to a stop, and Lilly was hit seconds after saving Spain. “The engineer said as he was coming up, he saw the dog pulling her off the tracks. But there wasn’t enough time,” Lanteigne said. “He then saw the dog come around between the train and my mom and take the hit of the train.” That heroic deed came at substantial cost: veterinarians were forced to amputate a badly mangled leg that was beyond repair. Lilly also suffered a broken pelvis, but remarkably, she is starting to bounce back. While receiving treatment for her injuries, the brave dog has been showered with letters of appreciation as news of her story spreads. ‘Jake the vet’ recently checked in on her progress, and offers an encouraging report in a new video released today. http://www.lifewithdogs.tv/2012/07/the-rehabilitation-of-a-hero-dog/

Saturday 14 July 2012

LENNOX: MORE LIES FROM BCC

Please go here and see slideshow proving the lies of BCC

http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/evidence-of-some-of-the-bcc-lies#slide=endcard

Victoria is the honest player. ONE of the honest.


I am so disgusted and want everyone to know how low Belfast City Council have stooped. The Barnes family heard about the death of their beloved dog through me because I had been told by a source at BBC Radio Ulster. After what the council put the family through they didn't even have the decency to inform the family first before everyone else know. Someone involved in this mess needs to lose their job. If this is the way they represent their citizens then Belfast beware. Belfast City Council should hang their heads for the shameful and insensitive way they have handled this. Heartless doesn't even begin to describe the people surrounding this case. Appalling and I can assure you, this will NEVER be forgotten!

Thank you Victoria for all you do. We will stick behind you for we are an army of thousands upon thousands.

BEWARE OF THOSE FRIENDS OF THE KILLERS OF LENNOX. THEY ARE EVERYWHERE.

The killers of Lennox have their network going. Its called Lemmings. 
Trust me they are hurting right now. Because of the thousands of people
who refuse to let those murderers get away with their cover up and their
attempts now to shut down anyone who is on a mission to make them suffer the correct consequences. No one is going away Lemmings...you are wasting your time. Be best if you just confess and ask God to forgive you for being a murderer and being an accomplice to that murder.
Lemmings lies and video tape. Yes..you truly are liars. And before its over you will go back under that rock you came out from.

Each shirt sold will be donated to Animal Rescues in the  name of Lennox.







I would like to share my conclusions on the case of the unjustified killing of Lennox.
After listening to what Peter Tallack had to say, it is clear to me that the first thing to understand is how his evaluation of Lennox initiated the series of events leading to the tragic death of this poor dog.
So, Peter Tallack – by his own admission – is not a dog behaviourist; he states that he was accidentally asked by BCC to measure the dog, only because he just happened to be in Northern Ireland at the time. Despite not being a certified dog behaviourist, he does express an opinion on the behaviour of Lennox on the day the dog is seized. Bear in mind, his so-called assessment will eventually be the only one taken into consideration by the Court of Law handling the case. In spite of other assessments being presented by qualified behaviourists, the Court bases the whole case on an unqualified opinion expressed by someone who just happened to be “in the right place, at the right time” and took the job offer.
Victoria Stilwell presented BCC with other options to which their reply was that their hands were tied. Well, this is actually a cop-out. 

Obviously, their hands were not tied had they allowed the case to be fully discussed by including the evaluations of independent experts – such as Jim Crosby – who could have provided a more thorough and complete analysis of the case.
In mathematics, two plus two always equals four. Hence, the conclusion can only be one: for reasons still unknown to the general public, a decision to suppress Lennox had already been made by the BCC members. The court case was just a sham. The Court verdict had been decided in advance, so it was a matter of working towards that particular conclusion. Therefore, the sole assessment deemed as appropriate was Tallack’s, and we know now he actually did not evaluate the dog, but merely expressed an (unrequested and unqualified) opinion. In fact, the Barnes family could have brought in the Albert Einstein of dog behaviourist: it would have been a waste of time.
Now, what sinister motives were there for something like this to take place? I don’t know much about Northern Ireland, or its democratic values, but if I were a citizen of that country and a tax payer, I would demand an inquiry to find out what dirty liaison existed between the Court and the BCC, and why some basic laws were infringed. By definition, laws have “the explicit intention to provide the most complete protection for his, her, or their rights to life, liberty, and property.” 
The backlash of angry reactions from the general public originates from the fact BCC has refused to come clean; its members have declined the opportunity to speak the truth and have avoided any civilised debate between the parties, ignoring repeated requests from respectable professionals to have also their facts taken in to account. Only those hiding something refuse such a dialogue. Could there have been a silent agreement or an exchange of favours between the Court and the BCC? What sordid affair is buried under this abominable abuse of power?
I have just learned that the people who work with Belfast Animal control have set up a  page on Facebook to continue with their cover up and are reporting to Facebook any one who happens to disagree with them.
Maybe this is one of those save your job affairs. They should ask for forgiveness and confess to their crimes.
If you go there. Be aware. Free speech is suspended unless you agree with them.
https://www.facebook.com/LLAAVINFO

Lennox was murdered. Evidence in black and white proves he was not a dangerous dog. The only thing dangerous are narcissistic people who believe they are above rebuke.


This sure makes the case for a picture is worth a thousand words. And no words need to
be said about these pics. and there are many more. More than enough to convict these
murderers of Lennox for his death and for their cover up afterwards and for their on
going cover up now. Playing the victim now. Despicable actions bring on consequences
too  bad they had been getting away with their murders so long without question and now
cannot stand the light being shone on them. They should confess. Ask for forgiveness and
retire somewhere far away from where there are no animals for them to kill.

Friday 13 July 2012

Sunday 8 July 2012

Sunday 1 July 2012


sitemap

June 30, 2012
At PEDIGREE®, we care about all dogs and their safety and well-being is extremely important to us. For that reason, we have initiated a voluntary recall of a limited range of three varieties of PEDIGREE® weight management canned dog food products due to a potential choking risk. Cans of this product may contain small pieces of blue plastic, which broke off a conveyor belt during the production process. The issue has been resolved at our manufacturing facility by replacing a conveyor belt with a redesigned tracking mechanism.
At Mars Petcare, we take our responsibility to pets and their owners seriously. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by this recall. Please see detailed information on the affected products below. You can also reach us at 1-877-720-3335 from 8:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. CST if you have questions.
Go to their website for the products recalled.

Wednesday 27 June 2012

Monday 25 June 2012

Please pray for the ones that cannot get away from this horror and that is the animals.

Monday 18 June 2012

Tuesday 12 June 2012

Monday 11 June 2012

Sunday 10 June 2012

A Dog-Owner's Story of Loss and Raising Awareness Posted on May 29, 2012 One of our beloved dogs, Jack, a 6-year-old, chow-lab mix, died yesterday. His death was very unexpected and traumatic. Although, our dogs did not receive the same amount of attention as they did before Bobby was born, they were still loved dearly. Bob walked them religiously every single day. Jack loved, loved, loved, playing fetch. Tennis balls were his favorite. When we discovered that he had died, we began questioning what happened to our sweet Jack. On Monday, May 7, we took both of our dogs to our vet for their annual check ups. It was a very routine visit. They were both checked for heartworms and parasites, weighed, and listened to. They were deemed normal and healthy. They both received their rabies vaccinations, and a new drug (via injection) that was recommend by our vet, ProHeart 6. Our vet simply said, "Hey, we have this new shot that we can give them for heartworm protection instead of an oral preventative. It's easy because it's only one dose every 6 months." Sounded good to us, so we agreed. That was it. That was all the information we received, and-by our own fault-all we asked for. Both of the dogs seemed fine the first week home, then Jack started acting differently. He didn't want to go on his daily walks. He didn't want to fetch his tennis ball. He didn't want to eat his dog food. My husband even tried giving him some leftover steak from our dinner, and Jack wouldn't eat it. We knew something was up, so we took him back to the vet on Monday, May 21. The vet discovered that Jack had a fever, but could find nothing else wrong with him. He was given a steroid shot and some antibiotics in case he had an infection, and we were sent home. Over the next few days, Jack seemed to feel better. He was still a little lethargic, but was eating and perked up when we threw a ball or petted him. He seemed on the mend. We thought he must have just had a virus and was getting better. It did not even cross our minds that he was so gravely ill, so we continued with our Memorial Day plans to go to the beach. We returned from the beach to a grim discovery-Jack dead in a pool of blood and vomit. His poor little body was crumpled up in a strange way, like he had literally just fallen over dead. We took him to an animal ER where they confirmed that he was dead, and we paid to have his body cremated. The vet at the animal ER stated that it appeared to be a heart attack or cardiopulmonary problem that killed him. That evening, as we wrestled with grief and trying to explain death to our 3-year-old son, we began to question what on earth had happened to our previously perky puppy. Okay-he wasn't a puppy, but he always behaved like a frisky, fun puppy, and he certainly wasn't an old dog. We considered the possibility that he ate something bad, but his vet had all but ruled out a GI problem. We went over and over what was different, the only thing we had changed was their heartworm medicine. We googled the shot he had received a few weeks earlier, ProHeart 6. The drug was originally made by a division of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, but the drug company Pfizer acquired Wyeth and all of its holdings in 2009. Pfizer's own website lists side effects of the drug as lethargy, loss of appetite, vomiting, and death. (Source: Pfizer) Jack had exhibited exactly all of those symptoms... in that order. After doing further research, we also discovered that the drug was originally pulled off the market in 2004 for a high rate of adverse reactions to the drug. "According to an informed veterinarian, 'Proheart caused more deaths in one year than all of the oral heartworm preventives combined did in ten years. When the FDA notified Pfizer that their drug was causing a problem, the manufacturer claimed it was due to the vaccines' being given at the same time. The FDA looked at the data again and told them the dogs involved had been getting their vaccinations all along and the only difference was the Proheart. That's when the FDA informed the company of their intent to pull it and the company then voluntarily took it off the market." (Source: The Senior Dogs Project)Ă‚ Pfizer was allowed to re-market the drug in 2008 with the following stipulations: Pfizer agreed to add additional warning labels to the drug packaging, and agreed to mandate that pet owners be given a drug fact sheet and be made to sign an "informed consent" document. Pfizer went even further as to mandate web-based training for veterinarians who gave the drug, and issued several "Dear Doctor" letters to all veterinarians regarding the adverse effects of the drug. (Read one of the "Dear Doctor" letters here.) The part that bothered and alarmed us the most was this line from the drug's website: "ProHeart 6 dog owners must be advised of the risks of ProHeart 6 and sign an Owner Consent Form prior to the first administration." (Source: Pfizer) We were never shown a fact sheet on the drug, never "advised of the risks", and certainly not given an Owner Consent Form" by our vet to sign. (In hindsight, we feel that we should have asked more questions about the drug, but we trusted our veterinarian.) If the side effects had been presented to us as they have in our research, we would NOT have consented to have Pro Heart 6 administered to our dogs. We also found some literature suggesting that ProHeart 6 should not be administered at the same time as vaccinations: "Allergic reactions, sometimes serious, have been reported when ProHeart 6 and vaccinations have been given at the same time. Talk to your veterinarian about the risks of administering ProHeart 6 at the same time as vaccinations." (Source link here.) Our vet administered ProHeart 6 at the same time as Jack rabies vaccine, and distemper/bordetella. The drug's information page from Drugs.com states the following: "Owners should be advised of the potential for adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, and be informed of the clinical signs associated with drug toxicity. Owners should be advised to contact their veterinarian immediately if signs of toxicity are observed. The vast majority of patients with drug related adverse reactions have recovered when the signs are recognized and veterinary care, if appropriate, is initiated." (Source: Drugs.com) When we did recognize that something was going on with our dog, we did what we thought good pet owners are supposed to do. We took him back to the vet. The vet should have recognized that he was having an adverse reaction to the ProHeart6 that she administered to him (without our "informed" consent) only weeks earlier and treated him appropriately. If the vetrinarian had recognized his symptoms, he could have recovered. She did not, and as a result, our otherwise healthy dog died. Now, we are left waiting on the drug to work its way out of our remaining dog's system praying that she does not fall victim to the same fate. Stories of dogs that died as a result of being administered this drug are abundant. Please, ask for all of the facts, side effects, and more information when your vet (or doctor) recommends this drug (or any drug). ProHeart 6 provides no additional benefits or protection than safer, oral heartworm preventatives. May 30 UPDATE: I truly appreciate all of your condolences and support, and all of you who have shared this blog on your social media sites. It makes me feel much better knowing that we are raising consumer consciousness. We aren't trying to tell you what to do with your pets, just encouraging you to gather information before making any decisions. A vet that works for Pfizer, the drug manufacturer, contacted us today to ask us if we would let them do an autopsy necropsy on Jack. (They had already called the crematorium to make sure his body had not been cremated yet.) We agreed. In fact, we felt relieved and feel that we will get some answers soon. His body is now on the way to the University of Florida to be examined by experts. Our other dog does not seem to be exhibiting the same symptoms (so far thank goodness). May 31 UPDATE: Pfizer called back today to let us know they were planning on reimbursing us for the money we paid to have Jack cremated. His body is being sent to a different laab in Florida and it will be 4-6 weeks before we get a full autopsy necropsy report. They are doing tissue samples, toxicology... The whole nine yards. Pfizer seems as interested in getting answers as we do. Which is more than we can say for our (former) vet. The vet has not responded to our requests for answers. (I.e. Did the vet who administered the shot complete Pfizer's mandatory training? Why were we not given the "Owner Consent Form" and drug fact sheet? Why did the vet not recognize Jack's symptoms when we took him back in?) I have received lots of emails and messages from others who have lost their pets. My heart goes out to you. Some have asked me to publicly name the vet. I'm not going to do that (yet). I may, or may not, do that when we receive the autopsy results. At that time, we will know who is truly culpable. In the meantime, just be sure to ask your vet (or doctor for that matter) for lots of information before consenting to anything.

Saturday 26 May 2012

Woof!" I said as you started the car, "Hooray!" I said, it's my first time afar. The scents we were passing were all new to me, For it was my first introduction to this mystery. As we got out of the car I embraced you with joy, After all you remembered to bring my favourite toy! You threw it once or twice, of which I retrieved, But on the third it seemed you were ready to leave. You threw it long and hard and I chased it like lightning, But when I turned to bring it back I saw a sight quite frightening. I gripped my toy hard as I tried to comprehend What it was I did wrong to make our relationship end. You walked back to your car as I sat there still loyal. Why am I subservient and you so royal? Your engine started, and you peeled out into the night, You didn't even care about my overwhelming fright. As I sat in my pose determined you would come back, The sun faded behind me while the surroundings turned black. Day after day I stayed in that park, Lying... waiting... too feeble to bark. As I lay there dying thinking of you master, I asked myself how I got into this horrifying disaster. With my last breath of life, I whispered your name Then I collapsed in a heap overrun by pain. Why didn't you love me master? Why didn't you care? Had I no significance, was I just a clump of hair? I stayed there master and I waited for you I guess taking care of me was just too much to do. I'm gone now master, no more You-and-I But what I can't figure out is why you didn't even say goodbye... -Author: Andrew Siegele-

Sunday 11 March 2012


Monday 2 January 2012


Blog Archive

Followers